Forbes on the NBA's social and demographic value for promotional partners

"The NBA partnered with four movie studios–Warner Bros., Universal, Sony and Disney–to create co-promotional spots advertising each respective studio's summer films along with the NBA Playoffs and Finals.  The NBA asserts that the demographics of its fan base were instrumental in securing these advertisements, as according to the NBA, 48-percent of its fan base is under the age of 35.  "The NBA's audience is the perfect match for these studios to market to.  We resonate with the core 18-to-34-year-old audience that they want to reach," Collins explained."

http://www.forbes.com/sites/aliciajessop/2013/06/06/the-nbas-extensive-digital-following-creates-unique-marketing-opportunities-for-the-finals/

Sports stadiums, Super Bowls, and zip lines: Crony capitalism's dubious economics

South Florida's 2016 Super Bowl bid promises to blow all previous bids out of the water, both in the size of the expected bid and in the ridiculousness of the expenditures.

From the Miami Herald:

South Florida’s Super Bowl Host Committee expects to spend about $21 million in private and public funds putting on the kind of Super Bowl outlined in the thick binder presented to NFL executives in New York. The confidential proposal includes creating a Super Bowl theme park in downtown Miami, including closing down Biscayne Boulevard, constructing a “Hail Mary Zip Line” along the waterfront and possibly mooring barges to accommodate some of the action, according to interviews and leaked details about the plans.

The success of the bid likely hinges on voters' approval of a publicly-financed renovation of the Dolphins' Sun Life Stadium. The Dolphins are lobbying for the public to chip half of the renovation's $400 million price tag. Public money would be generated through sales tax and a hotel bed tax.

The problems with public financing for the private profit of sports entities are well documented. First, taxpayers tend to pay much more for new and renovated pro sports stadiums than is initially forecast. Second, sports entities and promoters consistently overestimate the positive economic impact of stadium renovations and big-ticket events, including the Super Bowl. Dolphins lobbyist Ron Book projected a $500 million economic impact for the State of Florida from Super Bowl L -- a projection that PolitiFact Florida and The Miami Herald rated as "False." As Baade and Matheson's (2011) meta-analysis "Financing Professional Sports Facilities" explains:

Researchers who have gone back and looked at economic data for localities that have hosted mega-events, attracted new franchises, or built new sports facilities have almost invariably found little or no economic benefits from spectator sports. Typically, ex post studies of the economic impact of sports have focused on employment, ... personal income, ... personal income per capita, ... taxable sales, ... or tourist arrivals. These studies and a multitude of others generally find that the actual economic impact of sports teams or events is a fraction of that claimed by the boosters, and in some cases actually show a reduction in economic activity due to sports. 

Public financing of professional sports stadiums is an exemplar of American crony capitalism; we're capitalist at the bottom, and socialist at the top. And if history is any indicator, we'll see South Florida taxpayers disproportionately holding the debt for the private profit of the NFL, Dolphins majority owner Stephen Ross (net worth $4.4 billion), and other interested parties of the sports/media complex. 

But, hey, maybe zip lines will provide the economic impact that taxpayers have been looking for all these years.

For more on these topics, check out:

The Miami Herald -- Fantasy football: PolitiFact looks at Super Bowl economic impact

The Atlantic -- If You Build It, They Might Not Come: The Risky Economics of Sports Stadiums
Judith Grant Long -- Public-Private Partnerships for Major League Sports Facilities
Dave Zirin -- Bad Sports: How Owners Are Ruining the Games We Love
Bob Trumpbour -- The New Cathedrals: Politics And Media in the History of Stadium Construction
Kevin Delaney & Rick Eckstein -- Public Dollars, Private Stadiums
Roger Noll -- Sports, jobs, and taxes: the economic impact of sports teams and stadiums

Mobile Video Views Up 300% In 2012, With Tablets Driving The Charge With A 360% Increase - TechCrunch

"Overall, digital video saw growth across all platforms, with an increase of 30 percent year over year in Q4 2012 versus the same time in 2012. TV and sports content was responsible for a large chunk of that new viewership, and streaming video available has grown 50 percent between Q1 2011 and Q4 2012."
http://m.techcrunch.com/2013/04/09/mobile-video-views-up-300-in-2012-with-tablets-driving-the-charge-with-a-360-increase/

Capital One's March Madness plans: "Harvesting voice and pride" through social media

Ahhh... March. The change of the seasons. Time for March Madness sponsor Capital One to head out to the social media fields and harvest some of our "voice and pride" to drive traffic to the company's website. From ESPN's Kristi Dosh:

"Capital One will engage fans through social media channels by allowing the team with the most vocal fans to take over Capital One’s own social media accounts.  

Here’s how it works: Use the hashtag #rallycry any time you discuss your team on Facebook, Twitter or YouTube. The team with the “loudest and proudest” fans will be featured prominently on Capital One’s social media websites, which will be bathed in that team’s colors ...  

'It’s harvesting that voice and pride -- the loudest and proudest fans -- we’re going to be sweeping all that together and funneling it into a bit of a virtual scoreboard through our Facebook, Twitter and YouTube channel.'"

We've heard the metaphor of trying to "harness" users' social media productivity for several years; however, marketers like Capital One aren't nearly as passive in producing buzz as the "harness" metaphor implies. They actively create or "harvest" it.

Susan Crawford on telecom monopolies and sports programming's role in high U.S. Internet prices and slow speeds

On the Majority Report yesterday, Susan Crawford chatted with Sam Seder about her new book, Captive Audience: The Telecom Industry and Monopoly Power in the New Gilded Age. It's a generally insightful (and frustrating) talk about the absence of competition in the telecom marketplace -- especially the market for home broadband service.

Crawford "explains why the Internet should be treated like a electricity, why Wired access is essential for success in today’s economy, why private companies have no incentive to provide universal access, the industry push back against her ideas, why market concentration is so high in the wireless market and educating the public on the need for an communications policy."

Of particular interest to me was an exchange between Seder and Crawford about the role of sports in these processes (transcript below). Since sports content is so highly valued by consumers (and, arguably, the one type of programming that's holding the traditional cable model together), companies like Comcast can use their sports holdings/programming to erect barriers to entry to competing providers. Providers that, as Crawford explains, could offer (or force the big fellas to offer) faster and cheaper broadband services.

Profit Slides 6% at Disney as Movie and TV Divisions Lag

"ESPN had a significant impact on Disney's quarter, with programming expenses increasing for football and basketball. Those costs held back results for Disney's media networks unit, which houses the cable sports behemoth; operating income there increased a tepid 2 percent, to $1.21 billion. The growth came from the Disney Channel, ABC Family and higher ad sales at the ABC broadcast network."

http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/05/costs-at-espn-depress-disney-profits/

Sent from phone. Sory for tpyos.

PaidContent: How social media is becoming as important a live event as the live event itself

"Most of us will have to accept the fact that seperating live events from their social media counterparts is a losing battle at this point, but for brands like Oreo, the knowledge that they have a dual-platform audience creates real possibilities"

http://paidcontent.feedsportal.com/c/35063/f/648056/s/28405000/l/0Lgigaom0N0C20A130C0A20C0A40Chow0Esocial0Emedia0Eis0Ebecoming0Eas0Eimportant0Ea0Elive0Eevent0Eas0Ethe0Elive0Eevent0Eitself0C/story01.htm